ChatGPT and Noah's Ark
From a Friend
Several years ago I identified Karaca Dag as a likely site for the mountain where Noah’s Ark had landed and post-flood humanity began. After visiting the site published a paper in the Journal of Creation about it. It seems that ChatGPT has access to The Journal of Creation. My friend asked the AI about Karaca Dag as a proposed Ark site and this is what it said:
Ken Griffith, along with Darrell K. White, has proposed an intriguing theory regarding the location of Noah’s Ark. Their research focuses on Mount Karaca Dağ in southeastern Turkey, near Diyarbakir. This area is notable for its proximity to the origins of early agriculture, particularly the domestication of einkorn wheat, which aligns with the expectation that post-Flood human settlement would occur near the Ark’s landing site.
Key Aspects of Griffith’s Theory:
1. Geographical and Agricultural Significance:
• Mount Karaca Dağ is situated between the Tigris and Euphrates rivers, central to the Pre-Pottery Neolithic A (PPNA) culture.
• The region is recognized as the origin point for several domesticated crops, including einkorn wheat, chickpeas, and bitter vetch, suggesting early human habitation and agriculture.
2. Archaeological Features:
• The site includes a large stone structure resembling a mastaba tomb, measuring approximately 60 meters square, with extensions forming a boat-like shape about 160 meters long.
• This structure is oriented to the winter solstice sunrise and is accompanied by six or more geoglyphs situated along an arc 5 kilometers to the northwest.
3. Cultural and Historical Context:
• The presence of these features suggests a significant cultural or religious site, potentially linked to the narrative of Noah’s Ark.
• The alignment with early agricultural development supports the hypothesis of post-flood human settlement in the area.
Evaluation of the Theory:
Griffith’s theory presents a compelling case by integrating archaeological findings with historical and agricultural data. The association of the site with the early domestication of crops and its central location in the Fertile Crescent lend credence to the idea of early human settlement post-flood. However, the theory would benefit from further archaeological investigation and peer-reviewed research to substantiate the claims and establish a more definitive link to the biblical narrative of Noah’s Ark.
In conclusion, while Griffith’s theory is thought-provoking and grounded in a multidisciplinary approach, additional empirical evidence is necessary to validate the proposed location of Noah’s Ark on Mount Karaca Dağ.
